THE ADAMS TEAM
Rothwell Gornt Companies
Las Vegas Real Estate Agent Robert Adams Las Vegas Real Estate Blog
If you are looking for rental properties close to the airport you can plug in your info into this free renttal search and it will send you the properties that match: http://lvrealestatehelp.weebly.com/property-management--rent… I look forward to hearing from you. READ THE ENTIRE ARTICLE HERE: http://www.trulia.com/voices/Schools/apartments_close_to_mccarran_airport-544367-p_1-recent?answerId=1908224#left_content Best Regards, This house is listed for sale on the MLS but not for rent. Are you looking for a rental or to buyer? Either way we can assist you. Start your FREE rental search here: http://lvrealestatehelp.weebly.com/property-management--rent… Start your FREE no obligation buying search here: http://lvrealestatehelp.weebly.com/buying-real-estate.html Or feel free to contact me directly at the contact info below. I look forward to hearing from you. READ THE ENTIRE ARTICLE HERE: http://www.trulia.com/voices/Property_QandA/_santa_ynez_dr_i_inquired_about_this_house_i_re-544579-p_1-recent?answerId=1908217#left_content Best Regards, Fill out this free rental search form on my website and we will help you find a place that matches your scenario. http://lvrealestatehelp.weebly.com/property-management--rent… READ THE ENTIRE ARTICLE HERE: http://www.trulia.com/voices/Credit_Score/Where_can_I_find_a_home_to_rent_that_doesn_t_requi-544909-p_1-recent?answerId=1908195#left_content Best Regards, It sold on 6-11-2013. There are currently no homes available for sale in this neighborhood. The 4 properties that are for sale currently are already in escrow. If you want to fill out our buyer's form at the link below I can set you up on an auto search to received listings for this neighborhood the second they become available. This way you do not waste your time looking at listings that are not available. this will also help you get your offer in to the seller as soon as it hits the market vs waiting until it shows up on sites such as this one. Buyer's form: http://lvrealestatehelp.weebly.com/buying-real-estate.html Or feel free to contact me directly anytime. I look forward to hearing from you. READ THE ENTIRE ARTICLE HERE: http://www.trulia.com/voices/Property_QandA/Is_this_home_still_for_sale_-544741-p_1-recent?answerId=1908188#left_content Best Regards, This property is no longer available. Best Regards, It is now cheaper to buy a home than to rent in 98 of the 100 largest U.S. metropolitan areas. Years of post-bubble price declines, alongside stable or rising rents, have pushed down price-to-rent ratios across the country, according to Trulia’s Winter 2012 Rent vs Buy Index. The index tracks whether it is more affordable to rent or to buy a home by looking at asking prices on Trulia.com for rentals and for-sale homes with similar attributes in similar neighborhoods. Deciding whether to buy or rent depends on personal factors, of course – like whether you have saved up enough for a down payment, can qualify for a mortgage and whether you plan to stay in your next home for at least five years. But the ratio of home prices to annualized rent (after adjusting for property attributes and neighborhood characteristics) shows the relative affordability of home-ownership. After factoring in mortgage rates, taxes, insurance, maintenance and others costs, here’s the rule-of-thumb: buying is cheaper when the price-to-rent ratio is less than 15, and renting is cheaper when the ratio is above 20; between 15 and 20, renting or buying could win out depending on how long you’ll stay put and which tax bracket you’re in for the mortgage interest deduction. Only Honolulu and San Francisco are in the “it-depends” range of 15-20, while all other metros are in the “buying is cheaper” range of 15 or less. Even though buying beats renting in almost all metros, the price-to-rent ratios for each ranges all the way from 17 in San Francisco to less than 4 in Detroit – that’s a huge difference in the relative cost of buying across local markets. Variations in the price-to-rent ratios among metro areas follows clear patterns and reveal a lot about local housing markets. Take at look at the national price-to-rent map. In the darkest green areas, mostly in the Midwest and South, buying is more affordable relative to renting; in lighter green areas, mostly in the Northeast, California, Florida and the Southwest, buying is still more affordable, but not as strongly. And in yellow areas – San Francisco and Honolulu -- buying and renting are comparable. Remember that we’re looking at buying relative to renting: this means that in addition to being expensive, period, home prices in the Northeast and California are expensive even relative to local rents, which are high in those markets to begin with. What factors contribute to higher price-to-rent ratios in some metros? Surprise! It’s not the effect of the housing bubble. Metros where prices fell more during the bust don’t have either lower or higher price-to-rent ratios, on average, than other metros that weathered the bust better. Cleveland and New York, for example, saw similar price declines during the bust, but the price-to-rent ratios are high in New York and very low in Cleveland. In fact, of the metros where prices fell most from the height of the bubble – Las Vegas, Phoenix and many Florida metros - none make our top 10 list of metros with the lowest ratios. Long-term fundamentals, not short-term changes in prices, determine which metros have high price-to-rent ratios. Although there’s no correlation between the price-to-rent ratio and price declines during the bust, the correlation between the price-to-rent ratio and price changes over the past 10 or 20 years are very high (.6 and .55, respectively). Similarly, the price-to-rent ratio is correlated with employment growth over the past five or 10 years, but not over the past year. Two other long-term factors that change slowly are also related to a higher price-to-rent ratio: high housing density and low vacancy rates. What do these factors that explain the price-to-rent ratio all have in common? They all shape expectations about how local home prices will change in the future. Metros with long-term price growth (not just bubble-time growth) and long-term job growth will probably see continued housing demand growth. On the supply side, metros with low vacancy rates have less slack in the market, and those with high density have less room to build new housing – both of which mean tighter housing supply. Growing demand plus tight supply equals rising prices in the future. Future rising prices should affect the price-to-rent ratio because rising prices benefit homeowners but not renters. In markets where people expect prices to rise, home prices should be higher than other markets. All else being equal, people will pay more to buy (but not to rent) a home if they expect prices to rise in the future, which means the price-to-rent ratio should be higher. The price-to-rent ratio therefore reflects people’s expectations about future price increases. But here’s what’s scary. There’s a positive correlation (.35) between the price-to-rent ratio and home-price volatility over the past 25 years. Even after controlling in a regression for those other factors that affect the price-to-rent ratio (long-term price growth, long-term job growth, vacancy rate and density), past price volatility has a positive, significant effect on the price-to-rent ratio. That’s a surprise: people should pay less for a risky investment for a given expected return. (Simple example: economists expect most people would prefer to get $10 guaranteed rather than having a 50/50 chance to get $20 or nothing.) Not when it comes to housing, apparently. People are willing to pay more to buy relative to renting in markets that have more risk (higher past volatility in home prices), even after adjusting for the expected return (the long-term average rate of home-price growth). If people are still willing to pay more for homes in risky housing markets, is the next bubble inevitable? READ THE ENTIRE ARTICLE HERE: http://www.theatlanticcities.com/housing/2012/03/where-buy-and-where-rent-now/1545/ Best Regards, Although home price gains rival those of the last decade’s bubble, home prices today look undervalued by 7%. Prices are overvalued only in a few California and Texas metros. Home prices today are rising nearly as fast as they did during the peak bubble years of 2005-2006. Since that bubble helped push us into the Great Recession, we should all be on high alert for the next housing bubble. To track whether home prices are in or nearing bubble territory, today we introduce Trulia’s Bubble Watch, which is based on the most recent price data from the Trulia Price Monitor and other data sources. So are we in bubble territory? No. Bubble-phobes can rest easy. Even with recent sharp home price increases, prices are still low relative to fundamentals and are far below bubble levels. Back to Basics: How to Spot a Bubble To answer that question, we assess whether home prices are overvalued or undervalued relative to their fundamental value by comparing prices today with historical prices, incomes, and rents. Incomes determine how much people can pay for housing, and price increases aren’t sustainable if they push prices too high relative to incomes. Rents reflect how much people value housing even if they won’t benefit from price appreciation (as renters don’t, but owners do); the price-to-rent ratio is like the price-earnings (P/E) ratio for stocks. Using data from multiple sources (see footnote), we create several measures of fundamental value and combine them in order to calculate how overvalued or undervalued home prices are relative to fundamentals. Home Prices are Undervalued 7% Nationally and Regionally in 91 of the 100 Largest Metros At the metro level, prices are below their fundamental value in 91 of the 100 largest metros. Prices are overvalued in the California metros of Orange County (+9%), Los Angeles (+5%), San Jose (+3%), and San Francisco (+2%), and the Texas metros of Austin (7%), San Antonio (5%), and Houston (2%), as well as in Portland (plus Honolulu, which at 0.01% is ever so slightly overvalued). The California metros are far less overvalued than at the height of the bubble – Orange County prices were 71% overvalued in 2006 Q1! Even the Texas metros, which largely avoided last decade’s housing bubble, are less overvalued today than at their peaks during the last bubble. Prices are most undervalued today in Las Vegas and Detroit, even after their price gains in the past year. Several Florida and Ohio metros are also among the most undervalued. All of these metros were overvalued at the height of the bubble, some less so (Dayton, Akron) than others (Las Vegas, Palm Bay-Melbourne-Titusville). Other indicators aside from home prices, like mortgage lending and construction activity, confirm that the housing market isn’t forming a new bubble. Mortgage credit remains very tight, especially for people with lower credit scores, and the new “qualified mortgage” rules under Dodd-Frank intend to prevent the recurrence of toxic mortgages that artificially inflated housing demand in the last bubble. Also, construction activity, though rebounding, is still well below normal levels, and the vacancy rate is falling, so there’s no evidence of overbuilding today like we had during the last decade. Is the Next Bubble Coming Soon? 1. Inventory should expand. Tight inventory is boosting prices today as buyers bid up prices on scarce homes; however, as prices continue to rise, more people will sell as they get back above water or decide to cash out, and more new construction will add to inventory. 2. Mortgage rates should rise. Low mortgage rates today increase buying power because borrowers can afford a more expensive house for the same monthly payment. Rates are likely to rise as a result of the strengthening economy, either through market forces or Fed actions, which – along with more inventory – should slow down price gains. 3. Investor interest should fade. Undervalued prices have attracted investors, who have helped push up home prices as they have bought and rented out homes. But as prices rise, investor interest will fade. Will expanding inventory, rising mortgage rates, and declining investor activity cause home prices to plunge? Slow down, yes, but probably not plunge. Just as these factors should cause home prices to slow down, job growth and increased household formation should support a continued recovery in housing demand. Is Another Bubble Coming Ever? Notes: To get our estimate of over- or undervalued prices, we averaged together several measures of prices relative to fundamentals, including the price-to-income ratio, the price-to-rent ratio (national only), and the deviation of price growth from trend. We compared current values of these measures to the long-term average, excluding the most extreme quarters from the long-term average. We used the Trulia Price Monitor for current price trends as well as the Case-Shiller national index, the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) national expanded-data index, the FHFA all-transactions price indexes for metros, national and metro per-capita income from the U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis, and national owner-equivalent rents from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. Our historical time series goes as far back as the early 1980s, depending on the data source. We tested our approach by seeing how well our over-/under-valuation measure would have predicted metro-level price drops in the housing crash. The correlation between metro-level price over- or-undervaluation in 2006 Q1 and the subsequent metro-level peak-to-trough price decline was -0.83. READ THE ENTIRE ARTICLE HERE: http://trends.truliablog.com/2013/05/trulia-bubble-watch/ Best Regards, You want to be a for real, no joke investor. Like Kiyosaki, or Trump, or Gates, or who knows who. You don’t want to just be set for retirement. You want to make the most money in passive income you can so you are financially free and can do whatever you want. What do you need in order to make that happen? Requirements of Any Big-Time Investor1. Don’t Be Location-Specific. I’m sorry, but no one can tell me that the big boys all only buy investment properties locally and landlord their own properties. They just don’t do it. Where do they buy? Wherever the best deals are! Where the best deals are is always changing, and will always be changing. Some markets may be pretty consistent in always having good deals, and some markets may be pretty consistent in always having bad deals, but there is no market that will always have the best deals. Plus, an amazing deal may pop up totally under the radar in some random area at any given time for little rhyme or reason. Maybe even in an area that typically always has bad deals. The big-time investor jumps on whatever the best deals are, no matter where those might be. No big-time investor only buys locally. They also don’t work on their own properties. 2. Outsource All Work. Did I mention big-time investors don’t work on their own properties? No way. They only oversee the teams who do all the work. Big-time investors live off passive income. There is nothing passive about lifting a hammer during a rehab or taking repair calls from tenants. Those things are work. Work = not passive = not what big-time investors do. As Robert Kiyosaki says, “I don’t work for my money.” Meaning, he is not hands-on. His job as the big-time investor is to ensure proper teams are in place who will handle all the work associated with a property and then he just has to ‘manage the manager’ after that. And at his level, I’d imagine his job is to ‘manage the manager who manages the managers’. Then his other major task is to figure out how to creatively finance the deals so that it puts the highest returns possible back in his and his investors’ pockets. 3. Leverage as Much as Possible. Another famous debate. Do you pay all cash for a property or do you leverage? Well, what do the big boys do? I’ll give you a hint- they don’t pay all cash for anything! They leverage as much as possible. They know that using other people’s money is the smartest way to maximize returns on any investment deal. They are also smart enough to know that investing all cash into something is insanely risky because they could potentially lose all of that money. So they look for money from other sources than their own pocketbooks. 4. Know How to Find Money. I had an investor one time tell me that his full-time job, as a flipper, was finding money. It wasn’t flipping the houses, it was finding money. Every single deal required him to find more money. Why? Because he was slick enough not to use his own money for both risk and return reasons. At the point you consider time, effort, risk, and returns it is very obvious that you should always be using someone else’s money. Once you master how to find other people’s money, you can master real estate investing (assuming you know what to do with the money once you find it). If you can’t master finding other people’s money, or you insist on not leveraging for fear of, well not sure what the fear with leveraging even is, you will never become a big-time investor. What kind of investor are you? One who insists on only buying locally so you can do all the work yourself and manage the headaches, all while risking every penny of your own money? Or one who knows the real definition of passive income? READ THE ENTIRE ARTICLE HERE: http://www.biggerpockets.com/renewsblog/2013/06/01/big-time-investor/ Best Regards, When I first became a licensed Realtor many years ago, I began to work towards what I thought was the next big step – getting my Real Estate broker’s license. As many of you may know, doing so entailed that I take many Real Estate investing and appraisal courses. It was at one of these courses where I first heard the phrase ”the highest and best use of property,” and I didn’t fully quite understand the topic, that was until I found myself a few years later in a situation where I was looking to increase the value of one my rental properties. So instead of just sitting idle, I decided to get creative and revamp the house to generate more income then ever before. This creativity has even carried onto not only my residential ventures, but also with some of my commercial deals as well. Residential Real EstateWhen looking to get creative with any residential property, there are always multiple factors you have to look at, like: is there any extra space indoors? Could one bedroom be split into two without an incredible amount of rewiring or rerouting plumbing? Could one room be switched for another to create more space? Could you do both? I know I did at one of my rental properties, where I had a 3-bedroom house with a dining room, kitchen and 2 bathrooms. As far as kitchens go, the room it was in was small, so I decided to turn the dining room into a larger kitchen and make the original kitchen into an additional bedroom. The costs for doing so were minimal since the house needed a kitchen anyway and I was able to get an additional $200/month for rent for the additional bedroom! Now you don’t always have to shift around rooms either, I’ve cut bedrooms in half and turned attics into lofts in more properties than I can count. There is also another great way to add revenue to your residential rental, and that’s if you have enough extra outdoor space. In fact, my best rental properties aren’t even houses at all, they don’t have most utilities, and the tenants don’t live there. They’re actually garages! I built four commercial size garages behind the first duplex I ever bought. I had some extra ground that wasn’t really being used for much, so I decided to place some pre-fab garages. Not only did I almost double the value of the property and cash flow like crazy, I had fewer tenant headaches. Commercial Real EstateI once bought a three story, six unit, commercial apartment building with three efficiencies and three two-bedroom units. It was a total nightmare. The efficiencies had high turnover, the building only had one heater, and the tenants were constantly fighting. The turnover and maintenance were killing me. The Township wanted a trash dumpster put in (because it was considered a commercial building) and they were charging exorbitant inspection fees per unit. And let’s not forget the commercial mortgage with a five-year balloon on the property, along with the required commercial insurance, was getting ridiculously expensive as well. So, I weighed my options and got the bright idea to combine the units and separate the utilities. I changed it into three-unit apartment, each with four-bedroom two baths, with their own laundries. Then I refinanced to a regular residential loan on a triplex. I didn’t need the dumpster or commercial insurance anymore and I only had to deal with three tenants instead of six. My turnover decreased since I had stable families move in (instead of the transient people that tended to cause more problems with neighbors) and maintenance went down drastically (with only 3 kitchens instead of 6). But you don’t always have to rearrange properties to maximize profits; many people I know get creative from the get-go. A good friend of mine 1031 exchanged his residential units for a large commercial building just outside of Philadelphia. Instead of renting out the whole building to one tenant, he turned it into a shared commercial space and made a little business out of it. He would charge $450/month per office room so smaller scale businesses could now have office space right outside of Philadelphia for much cheaper than if they had to rent a larger unit. Tenants could choose to operate onsite with multiple rooms or be offsite, with either option they share a lobby, conference rooms, and they even share my friend’s two employees: a receptionist and a clerk who sorts mail, faxes, etc. These employees will handle calls and mail just like your own receptionist would at a large-scale company. He even leases televisions in the lobbies where other companies in the building could advertise – which is especially beneficial because most of the companies in the building were related to a similar industry. And since it’s right outside of Philadelphia’s city limits, it eliminates the city wage tax for both my friend and his tenants! ConclusionSo no matter what the deal, there is usually an interesting way to make income if not more income by doing something besides traditionally renting it out. It’s like when people ask me if I’m afraid of competition in my note business, and the answer is and will probably always will be “no, because I’ll just be more creative.” I’m a firm believer in studying the great developers who have gone before us to gain great ideas and inspiration. A hero of mine, William Zeckendorf, wasn’t afraid to take risks and get creative. Zeckendorf, who was known for working with architects I. M. Pei and Le Corbusier, developed the land in which the United Nations building now sits in New York City, as well as Century City in Los Angeles. The United Nations building area was a slum before Zeckendorf, and he took huge risks developing the property (even going bankrupt in the process!) but that didn’t stop him. He went against the grain, and if you want to get the highest and best use of your property you may have to do that too. So be bold, get creative! And if you have already, tell me, what’s the highest and best use of your Real Estate? READ THE ENTIRE ARTICLE HERE: http://www.biggerpockets.com/renewsblog/2013/06/05/highest-and-best-use-property/ Best Regards, If you send me info regarding the type of home you are looking for I would be happy to assist you with find a home to purchase. The easiest way to get this info to me is to fill out our "Buyer's Form on our website here: If you have specific address you are interested in you can read below to check recent crimes and school ratings in that area. Please see the following links to check crimes that have occurred recently around addresses that you plug in. The Las Vegas Metropolitan Police website covering Clark County and the City of Las Vegas, has a page where you can search crime statistics. We've included the link below. For areas covered by N. Las Vegas police: For the City of Henderson: This is the link to the Clark County School District. Again, you can enter in the address you are interested in and it will pull up the schools zoned for that specific house. There are reports and ratings on each school, this will give you a better idea of how well that each school is performing. Once you enter the address, you can click on the school name, then click on the school website and on their front page look for the "Accountability Report". This will give you very detailed information on each school and how they are performing. READ THE ENTIRE THREAD HERE: http://www.trulia.com/voices/Home_Buying/What_are_the_safest_neighborhoods_in_Las_Vegas_for-534399-p_1-recent?answerId=1898810#left_content Best Regards, Best Regards, If you would like to receive listings of properties that ARE available and that match your search criteria let me help. Either contact me directly at the info below or send me your search criteria via our buyer's form here: Once we have this info we can email you the properties that are currently available. READ THE ENTIRE THREAD HERE: http://www.trulia.com/voices/Property_QandA/where_are_the_photos_of_home_-539580-p_1-recent?answerId=1898785#left_content Best Regards, How is the Market for Selling a 3 bed 2 bath 1,658 sq. ft. Single Story in Southern Highlands?7/1/2013 The market is very strong. You should have no problem getting it in escrow within a week if it is priced correctly. Did you get your property sold? If you are looking for someone to help get it sold for you please let me know. We have an extensive marketing plan for our listings in addition to putting it on the MLS. If you would like to discuss it further please feel free to contact me directly at the info below. READ THE ENTIRE ARTICLE HERE: http://www.trulia.com/voices/Home_Buying/How_is_the_market_for_selling_bed_bath_sq_ft_S-528751-p_1-recent?answerId=1897953#left_content Best Regards, National Association of Realtors Will Allow MLS's to Charge Members for Public-Facing Websites7/1/2013 WASHINGTON — The National Association of Realtors today adopted a policy that spells out “basic” services multiple listing services can charge all members for — including the operation and promotion of public-facing websites that allow consumers to search for homes for sale. Many MLSs already operate public-facing websites. But some large brokerages objected to NAR taking a formal stance that MLSs that choose to provide those and other services can require members to pay for them, regardless of whether they want them or use them. At NAR’s midyear meeting in Washington, D.C., Thursday, a policy committee signed off on an amendment to NAR’s model MLS rules to classify not only the operation, but the promotion of public-facing MLS sites, as a “basic” service. But NAR’s Executive Committee, which makes recommendations to NAR’s board of directors, stripped language addressing public-facing MLS sites from the amendment on Friday. The move — which some said was made to appease large brokerages that object to MLSs operating public-facing websites — surprised some members of the Multiple Listing Issues and Policies Committee. The amendment put forward by NAR’s Executive Committee failed to pass today. After a lengthy debate, the amendment was voted down, 275-341. NAR’s board of directors then adopted the amendment originally put forward by the Multiple Listing Issues and Policies Committee, without further debate. By passing the amendment as originally put forward Thursday, NAR’s board of directors has given MLSs around the country more leeway to decide whether to charge members for operating and promoting public-facing websites. - See more at: http://www.inman.com/2013/05/18/nar-will-allow-mlss-to-charge-members-for-public-facing-websites/#sthash.NhZybK3z.dpuf Bill Lublin, vice chairman of the Multiple Listing Issues and Policies Committee, noted on Thursday that the amendment was not intended to either promote or impede the use of public-facing MLS websites, but to allow MLSs to make decisions on a local basis. Shad Bogany, a NAR director and chairman of the Texas Association of Realtors, said the board’s decision would allow associations to consider public-facing websites without fear that they will be out of compliance with NAR MLS policy. Craig Cheatham, president and CEO of the Realty Alliance, an association of 70 U.S. brokers, said he was disappointed by the board’s vote. The debate became a referendum on whether MLSs should have public-facing websites rather than focusing on whether the policy itself was sound, he said. He predicted lawsuits and disputes would arise from within the industry because of questions regarding tying the MLS website service to MLS participation given that public websites are now classified as a basic, not optional, service that MLSs may oblige members to pay for regardless of use. “This is not a big broker issue,” he said. “No broker is wanting to be charged for something by the MLS that they do not want and do not use.” Bob Hale, CEO of the Houston Association of Realtors, supported including public-facing sites as a basic MLS service, but said he would have been content with sites as an optional service, so long as they were included in the policy. But regardless, he said, “In most markets I can’t imagine any broker would choose to opt out” if their MLS had a public-facing site. The amendment of MLS Policy Statement 7.57, “Categorization of MLS Services, Information and Products,” approved today, started out as a proposed rule change to allow MLSs and Realtor associations to charge members for providing lockboxes as a “basic” service. Because of antitrust concerns, NAR has required that MLSs and Realtor associations categorize lockbox services as “optional” — meaning they could not require members to pay for lockbox services unless they actually used them. The amended policy will allow MLSs and Realtor associations in most parts of the country to classify lockbox and other services now considered “optional” as “basic” services that all members pay for, as long as the MLS or Realtor association is not making a profit in providing those services. In some parts of the country, courts have ruled against this “economic interest” exemption from antitrust issues, or there is no precedent allowing it. States and territories where MLSs and Realtor associations will not be allowed to treat lockboxes and other services now considered as “optional” as “basic” include Arkansas, Connecticut, Iowa, Maine, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, New Hampshire, New York, North Dakota, Puerto Rico, Rhode Island, South Dakota and Vermont. The amended policy also lists services that MLSs and Realtor associations in all states will be allowed to classify as “basic,” and provide to all members: sold and comparable information. - See more at: http://www.inman.com/2013/05/18/nar-will-allow-mlss-to-charge-members-for-public-facing-websites/#sthash.NhZybK3z.dpuf READ THE ENTIRE ARTICLE HERE: http://www.inman.com/2013/05/18/nar-will-allow-mlss-to-charge-members-for-public-facing-websites/ Best Regards, A proper marketing plan should be used by the listing agent. Our team has a marketing team that makes sure your property gets the maximum exposure in addition to the exposure it receives on the MLS. We discuss the various ways we market the property during our listing appointments. READ THE ENTIRE ARTICLE HERE: http://www.trulia.com/voices/Home_Buying/If_you_are_SELLING_YOUR_PROPERTY_here_is_a_good_q-539179-p_1-recent?answerId=1897921#left_content Best Regards, |
Blog Author:
|
Connecting